The “deferred win” strategy in sports betting has not won much love from bettors. The method is inferior to the long-only or flat strategy in terms of popularity. However, the approach can bring tangible dividends. The basis of the method is reinvesting profits. Let’s look into it in more detail.
What is the essence of the “Delayed Winning” betting strategy?
The Deferred Gain scheme has been called dangerous by some experts. Such an opinion is erroneous. The model is based on 3 postulates:
- A starting bet of 2% of the bankroll;
- reinvesting half of the net profit;
- Selection of events with odds close to 2.0.
In case of a successful game the betting amount will be constantly increasing. In case of a series of defeats (losstrike) the bettor will not reset the game balance. The above examples have not become a dogma. The player is free to modify his tactics in the way he likes. For a better understanding of the situation, here are some examples of calculations.
Example of calculations for the delayed winnings tactic
Let’s imagine the situation. The player’s initial bank is 10,000 euros. A client of a bookmaker’s office bets on events with odds of 2.0. Let’s say the user has made 3 successful bets. The situation is as follows:
The client “put” 200 euros on the first bet. After the bet, the betting company paid out a similar amount in net profit. Half of it went to the bankroll, part of it was used for new bets.
The second bet the player makes for 300 euros. On coming in, BC pays the same profit. 150 goes to the bankroll (the amount reaches 1050 euros). The rest goes to the next bet.
The third bet is made for 450 euros. In case of success 225 euros is added to the bankroll. The same amount goes to new bets.
If unsuccessful, player goes back to initial bet. The player starts again with 2% of the bankroll.
Pros and cons of the Deferred Gain scheme
The advantages of the “Deferred Gain” methodology are obvious. At the start, the client will have to bet 2% of the deposit. A long series of losses will not bring the account to zero quickly. Suppose a bettor with a bank of 1,000 roubles has hit a series of “plums”. The size of the bankroll will sag slowly:
- 20 – the initial bet, the balance is 980;
- 6 – second bet, bankroll 960.4;
- 2 – third bet, bankroll 941.2.
The logic behind betting is clear – with a succession of failures, the client will risk less money each time. The pluses of the method include versatility. The tactic is suitable for quickly breaking the bank. The onset of a black streak will not lead to zeroing the balance.
Now for the disadvantages, because the model has enough disadvantages. During victories, the betting sizes increase. The player has to risk large sums. The psychological pressure on the user increases. The losses will be frequent. The original scheme advises to pick events with odds 2.0 and higher. It is difficult to show good passability with such a model.
Variants of modifying the scheme
The basic rules are not on the list of “doctrines”. Bettors may change their approach to betting. It is a good idea to try a different approach, i.e. lower odds. It is possible to play with the odds at 1.5-1.8. The odds of such events will increase. A higher passability is required. However, it is more difficult to run into a losing streak.
Before using these tactics, a bettor must remember 1 nuance. There are no bankroll allocation models that give a guaranteed result. You have to learn how to analyse the game if you want to be in the black. It is impossible to do without a detailed analysis of matches. Only a comprehensive approach will help you beat the bookmaker at a distance.
Only betting on arbitrage situations can guarantee victory. The use of such schemes is fraught with blocking. It will not be possible to restore access to your account.